Knowing the effect of television on choosing ways has always been a noteworthy matter when it comes to talking about the young people. That is owing to the fact that no one can deny the profound effect of young people and the ways which choose on the future of the society. There are a plethora of people who contend the disadvantages of television on young people far outweigh the advantages. Others disagree. I, to a great extent, corroborate the first perspective as it seems more rational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons in support of my viewpoint in detail.
To commence with, the most imperative reason comes to mind is about the direction that young people can get by watching the TV because of their experience. It is conspicuous that the young people have low experience in different field and they are more vulnerable to make a bad and obnoxious decision. In this situation, it is easy to find out that they can be more influence by the program which show on TV. Let me tell you about the social research which has been conducted recently in this subject. The researcher found out that the more the young people more affected by the TV in comparison to the old people. Also, it has been shown that the more the young people watched TV, the more they were unsuccessful. As you can see, the negative effects of the television far outweigh the positive effects.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned here is about the advertisement. As we all know, all the mode be extended in the society by advertising. Also, it is clear that the TV has specific portion in this extension. The bad effect of the advertisment has been shown in fast food restaurants, strange style of dresses, and so forth. We can see that these effects most of the time show itself in the young people. For instance, compared to my father, I really going more to the fast food restaurant. In addition, the style of my mother's dresses were very simple but I, sometimes wear something strange which I saw on the TV shows and it is just because of the mode in the society. These experiences hold the view that the bad effect of TV programs are more in young people.
To wrap it all up, taking the aforementioned ideas into consideration, we may draw the conclusion that not only the TV get bad direction to the decision of the young people but also it can provide for them the situation to change their lifestyle, the style of dresses and their food. So, it is highly recommended that young people think about everything and have consulted with someone who has a good grasp of something and do not allow to be influenced by different parameters.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 88
- sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insist 73
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 71
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, for instance, in addition, talking about, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62288135593 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6615263196 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46186440678 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6112108633 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25000077479 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737562202816 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574247526063 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155941865734 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602721465198 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.