Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and TV programs made in one’s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries
In the present day, television plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance the popularity of television programs among viewers. The issue of whether or not domestic television programs are more interesting compare to foreign ones has provoked controversy among human beings. I assert that television programs which produce in our country are not interesting as the foreign ones. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor to take into account is that people would learn the culture of foreign countries by following their television programs. To shed more light on this matter, since travelling to many countries brings huge financial costs; most people would not afford it. As a result, many psychologists believe that by following television programs which produce in foreign countries individuals be able to learn many cultural aspects of host countries. Consider the Eyde Nowroze ceremony in Iran, for instance. Alongside this event, most of the television programs in Iran belongs to Eyde Nowroz events, and they try to show all aspects of the culture of this event. Hence, if humans watch them, they would gain much information such as picking up the Nowroze table and learning how people visit each other.
Another equally significant point is that other television programs are having a high quality of production. To shed more light on this matter, in some countries especially that are struggle with poverty filmmakers cannot either afford a high quality of equipment or use well-known actors in their products. Furthermore, knowledge also is not growing in poor countries and they don’t have adequate information for producing high-quality products so that their television programs are not interesting for people. Moreover, individuals tend to watch some films or movies for learning something from them. To be noted, especially students who want to learn foreign language spend much time for watching movies till they learn languages. Because of this, programs that produce in other countries are more interesting compare to domestic ones.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I personally believe that people tend to watch television from other countries. his idea is as a result of these two matters that television production from others not only make a chance to become familiar with their culture but also make opportunities for watching high-quality products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...on programs among viewers. The issue of whether or not domestic television programs are more i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: His
... watch television from other countries. his idea is as a result of these two matter...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44527363184 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81839917797 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9255462865 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.210526316 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17162327328 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620445907759 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568160537742 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106669813701 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431806814785 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.