Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
No books should ever be banned.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Books are essential in broadening people's perspectives. Books help them to constantly challenge and improve their ideas and also provide additional knowledge. However, there may be some books that could cause detrimental effects on the society and I believe that such books should be banned. The reason to why I believe in such way will be elaborated in more detail below.
First of all, books that ignite the worst desire of people should be banned. There are several books that trigger the depression among people and because of its popularity, the effect could be nationwide. I would like to mention a book called 1984 as an example. This book was first categorized as science fiction and depicted a character who was living in the future in a dull society where all citizens were inhibited from pursuing their own freedom. The character tried hard to escape from such society but constantly faced failure, and he eventually took his own life due to being overpowered by severe depression. While the overall atmosphere of the book was very blue and depressing, it became a best seller in the United States. The timing of its increase in popularity coincided with the Industrialization era, causing a trigger to many of those who had depression. Majority of the readers started taking their own lives and left no choice for the government but to ban the book. For books such as the 1984, which can have a lethal effect on the society should be banned for the overall welfare of people.
Furthermore, due to technological advancement, children can easily access to books that can have a negative impact on their characteristics. Books that provide wrong ideas such as it is okay to sexually harrass others or people should behave in a certain way should be banned because the ideas presented in such books can affect children who are still in the process of developing their own personality and perspective. As an example, because children are susceptible, those who are exposed to books that assert that it is wrong to be homosexual may constantly inhibit themselves from loving the same sex. As they grow older, their belief and desire would conflict with each other, leading to psychological damage. If the government do not ban books that consist of wrong ideas, then children who access to such books via Internet with mobile devices or computers would have a permanent impact on their characteristic and their perspective.
To sum up, while most books are beneficial in improving and broadening one's perspective, there are some books that should be banned from society. Books that ignite people's worst desires or books that can present wrong ideas to children in developing their perspective should not be accessible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-14 | Cookiedough | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-22 | Huge Jackman | 60 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 78
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 68
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 50
- Going green is when individuals and companies put in effort to reduce their impact on the environment The goal is to reduce their carbon footprints mainly by increasing the use of recyclable products and decreasing their waste production Going green has m 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 700, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...was very blue and depressing, it became a best seller in the United States. The t...
^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'book'.
Suggestion: book
...ancement, children can easily access to books that can have a negative impact on thei...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... beneficial in improving and broadening ones perspective, there are some books that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'peoples the worst'.
Suggestion: peoples the worst
... banned from society. Books that ignite peoples worst desires or books that can present wrong...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, as to, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00881057269 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77655032275 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488986784141 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3684363646 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.7 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177330047087 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649684553299 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383674883652 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130361277784 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108869070883 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.