Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together
When it comes to spending time with family, some people argue that nowadays it is not important to have regularly family meals together. However, on a personal level, I quite disagree with it.
To begin with, I understand why people think having meals with family is not vital. First of all, because of the development of public transportation, people tend to live far away from their family members, and even study or work abroad based on globalization. So it is not convenient and will cost much energy as well as money to have meals with family. Secondly, thanks to advanced social technologies such as Facetime, people are able to talk with their family everywhere at any time regardless of their distance. In that case, the necessity for a family to gather and have meals are becoming less, not to mention that most people are too occupied to visit their parents.
Understandable as the above argument may seem, in my opinion, it has neglected every drawback of online conversation and has devalued family relationships. For one thing, talking online even with cameras can never totally supplement face-to-face gatherings, especially for family members. Communicating through computers or mobile phones contributes to decreasing people's sincerity. For example, since my university is far away from my home, I tend to talk with my parents through Wechat. But the fact is that I usually lose my patience and finish the conversation very quickly. Since I never regard such talks precious and refuse to discuss some deep thoughts online. For another, phone calls are not able to give me a sense of belonging and only make me feel more lonely.
But when it comes to having meals with my family, it is totally a different picture. In general, we tend to concentrate more on each other, thereby discussing can be more efficient and comfortable. More importantly, it is the best time for family members to get to know each other better in order to build a closer bond. I enjoy having meals with my family, since it is cozy and comfortable, especially with delicious dishes made by my parents. Moreover, it is one of the best ways for me to ease my mind and take a break. No matter how I am confronted with overwhelming pressure, just some warm words from my parents can make me more confident when faced with troubles and difficulties.
As a result, I firmly believe that it is very important to have regularly family meals together.
- In surveys Mason city residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, fising) among their favorite recreational activities. The mason river flowing through this city is rarely used for these pursuits, however and the city devotes less of its budget to mai 55
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 55
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 88
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put before the verb 'can'.
Suggestion: never can
...thing, talking online even with cameras can never totally supplement face-to-face gatheri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, for one thing, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88674698795 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79389875047 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532530120482 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6461132064 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7619047619 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309994571001 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101210684709 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903777062743 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217293643749 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869269669006 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.