Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn about a person from the books and movies that he likes.
Living in cosmopolitan cites, people typically acquaint with spread spectrum of people and become friend depending on their characters and personalities. To this end, they should learn about the person assessing their behaviors, their interests, their clothing style and so forth. Therefore, the question whether one can learn regarding a person from books and movies which he likes, has long been a topic of controversy among people and different circles. On the one hand, there are people who adhere to the belief that one can judge about person’s personality and behavioral habits knowing what movies or book he likes; on the other hand, others believe that there are other ways, which are more advantageous, to learn about a person. As far as I am personally concern, the latter carries further weight since not only can one learn from clothing style but also can one learn from travelling with a person.
Clothing style is a good indication of person’s personality. First, different colors will convey different meanings. As a matter of fact, bright and strong colors such as red and orange or yellow are the symbol of excitement and light colors such as blue and green stand for peace and calmness. Then, people can assess others observing that one gives priority to particular colors. For instance, I have an older brother who always wear T-shirt with bright colors reflecting his dynamical and adventurous personality. Furthermore, the way which one wear a cloth is also a way to know his personality. For instance, there are people who wash their clothes every week and iron them several time during week. reflecting that they are a neat and discipline person in their daily life. Subsequently, provided one wants to learn about a person’s personality, he should pay attention to his clothing style.
Having close interaction with a person is also beneficial. First, people usually reflect their personality and behavioral habits through communication with others. Thanks to technological advancements, there are several means of communication such as cell phone, social network, email and so on. Although, I personally believe that face-to-face communication is more beneficial since there some feeling which people cannot express when they are talking with cell phone or texting message. Furthermore, people express how they really behave and what they really like when they are in difficult situations. For instance, last year I was travelling with my friends but there was a person which I was recently acquainted with him and I thought he is an impatient person. But when we had a problem with car, he kept calm and manage to handle the situation and got us back on the road. Then, this event changed my mind completely. Consequently, one cannot learn about a person unless they closely interact each other.
To wrap it up, clothing style and having close interaction with a person are more advantageous than learning from books and movies he likes. Therefore, if I want to learn about a person, I will establish a close relation with him and consider his clothing style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-24 | Meysam-Khan | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-21 | Meysam-Khan | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Who influence more, family or friends? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...clothing style and so forth. Therefore, the question whether one can learn regarding a person from b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to regard'.
Suggestion: to regard
...ore, the question whether one can learn regarding a person from books and movies which he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
... their clothes every week and iron them several time during week. reflecting that they are a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reflecting
...and iron them several time during week. reflecting that they are a neat and discipline per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'several means'.
Suggestion: several means
...o technological advancements, there are several means of communication such as cell phone, so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2606.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15019762846 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82297293816 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49209486166 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0068610858 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.24 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334317669464 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987171754598 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10205935588 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237863795466 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112975867373 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.