There are undoubtedly certain benefits to make decisions quickly as a leader, it means that problems can be solve immediately and the leader will be considered as effective. However, it could also lead to more mistakes since problems cannot be considered comprehensively. I could hardly agree more with the statement that A leader should take a long time for decision making. The fundamental and deeper discussion will be illustrated as follows.
Spending more time on considering tends to make a wiser decision. For one thing, it is quite wise for a leader to listen more to others before the decision making. It is widely acknowledged that each individual has his own strengths and weaknesses. We can learn more about certain fields from other ideas thus having a deeper and comprehensive understanding of it. In this way, we will be more competitive equipped with others' fresh ideas. It can help us consider problems from different perspectives and avoid various of mistakes. For another, more time provides with opportunities for find and solve some hidden problems in advance, and the cost of problem solving in the future could be reduced. For instance, if a project leader takes more time to find potential risks of a project and manages to eliminate them before the project carried out, the group will face much less problems during execution of the project. On the contrary, if making decision too fast, the potential risk cannot be found, and it is possible that diverse kinds of bad situations could happen and even result in failure.
In addition, it is a good way to expand social networks. Compared with people who decide things immediately, taking more time to consider problems more thoroughly can leave a favorable impression on others that the man is reliable, and hence they have more harmonious relationship with others. They will be classified as better coworkers and others will be more willing to work with them. In this circumstance, they will be provided with more opportunities because of the pleasant impression they leave on others. When doing business, others will consider them as a perfect partner because they are rigorous. During cooperation, less conflict will occur, and they can achieve a win-win situation. By contrast, making decision quickly as a leader may leave an impression on others that he is not a believable man. Thus, it could cause difficulties in dealing with interpersonal relationships and even leads to loss of time and money.
To sum up, we may safely conclude that it is better to take much time to make decisions as a leader. This is because it is not only able to avoid certain mistakes, but also can help expand social networks.
- The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children's education. Which one do you think is better? Why?- hire more teachers to teach in a small class- make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory- provide some training co 73
- After doing a presentation you want to identify your weaknesses and improve your skills Which of the following ways do you think is better 1 Review your recording alone 2 Let classmates or colleagues give suggestions and discuss about them 47
- TPO48Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments and private companies should share their scientific discoveries with the rest of the world. 76
- Technology designed to make people s lives simpler makes people s lives more complicated 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 874, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t carried out, the group will face much less problems during execution of the projec...
^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t also can help expand social networks.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in addition, for one thing, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02232142857 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82683422032 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493303571429 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5341714392 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8260869565 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265588457106 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825042639305 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069853240142 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182765237176 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391665505476 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.