Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
▲
For everyday life, one has to make decisions about their life and it is critically important for young people to make precise decisions in their life. Personally, I agree that in comparison to the past, today young people are better able to make their decisions rather than taking them from their parents. I agree because of the following reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, it is the era of science and technology and it is much easier today to gather information about which one is good and which one is deleterious. A person who confronts the difficulty may able to collect information using internet technology. Internet is the accumulation of information and to make a decision they may be collect the related information from the internet or contacting with a person like who faces the same difficulty by using social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. In the past, it was not easy to do such tasks because the technology was not that advanced as it is today. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year it was my time to choose a university and choose a major for my undergraduate study. I was passing a hard time to select which course was suitable. My parents who were also backdated and not aware of my generation's demand could not help me a lot to overcome. But afterward, I contacted one of my seniors using the internet and discussed with him about various aspects of selecting the major and finally I was able to select the most demanded course and did well in my university.
Secondly, people nowadays like more freedom than in the past. Young people like to be free about the decision they make in their life. In older days due to the information gaps young people did what their parents were likely to do. Like if a man's father was a businessman then he wanted his son also become a businessman. But today, young people want their freedom about their life and how they lead it with others. My cousin's experience is a compelling example of this. Ten years ago when he completed his graduation he became an engineer but afterward, his father told him to join his small plastic industry to make it larger and widespread. Even though he didn't want to join, lack of freedom on those days made it difficult for him to disobey his father. In contrast, When my older brother graduated last year he made his decision on his own and didn't hear anyone about his career. If the lacks of freedom still exist, then it would be difficult for him to make his decision.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that today young people are much more able to make decisions about their own life. This is because they depend on technology rather than their parents and they want their freedom in making decisions and do not want to depend on their parents about making their decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico 3
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp me a lot to overcome. But afterward, I contacted one of my seniors using the ...
^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t larger and widespread. Even though he didnt want to join, lack of freedom on those ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ear he made his decision on his own and didnt hear anyone about his career. If the la...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65148514851 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56866567094 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427722772277 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8617236294 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415995163367 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127209209862 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135989573617 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318349582981 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155753966531 0.0645574589148 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 957, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp me a lot to overcome. But afterward, I contacted one of my seniors using the ...
^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t larger and widespread. Even though he didnt want to join, lack of freedom on those ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ear he made his decision on his own and didnt hear anyone about his career. If the la...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65148514851 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56866567094 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427722772277 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8617236294 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415995163367 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127209209862 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135989573617 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318349582981 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155753966531 0.0645574589148 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.