Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer.
Fashion is important in modern life. One can tell people who he is through what he chooses to wear. Some people believe that we behave differently when we wear different clothes. I strongly disagree with this statement for several reasons.
The main reason is that characteristics are the key factor influencing one behavior in general. People might choose clothes based on their characteristics and activities but their behavior would be consistent while wearing various kind of fashion. This means that characteristics rule the way we choose clothes and also rule our behavior but clothes cannot affect our way of actions. For example, I would wear a shirt for a formal interview or skirt for picnic but I am still using public transportation for traveling as usual because I am an environment-friendly type of person. As can be seen, clothes play no role on my traveling behavior but characteristics are key.
Another reason for my opinion is, people may wear different fashion but their behavior is consistent all the time. In other word, people can change various style of clothes but their actions describe themselves in a concrete way. One person can change their style but his behavior in one concrete relationship is usually unchanged. For instance, my best friend changes her style to be more elegant when she becomes a celebrity. However, when we meet up, she still laughs at my jokes and we still enjoy street foods at local restaurants. Therefore, in most case, people change clothes to be better at outside image but their behaviors are still the same.
To sum up, people might think behavior can be changed when changing fashion. I do believe that behavior is consistent with our characteristics and relationship that are difficult to change only by clothes variation. People can wear seven styles on seven days of a week but they will act the same during that week.
- Excessive traffic has made cities unpleasant places to live and work in For this reason private cars should be completely banned from city centres 95
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 93
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a concrete way" with adverb for "concrete"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s but their actions describe themselves in a concrete way. One person can change their style but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00952380952 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9062690166 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530158730159 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8703512495 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197379772849 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690226150502 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736256268073 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144620211386 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774302251769 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.