Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, a prime and fundamental controversy on the issue whether custom effects on the behavior of the people or does not. Some people would claim that wearing is a completely different factor of an individual than their charecterictics. However, as far as I am concerned, I agree that the way a person behaves relates on many factors such as the clothes he/she puts on, the car he/she uses, etc for two following reasons.
first and foremost reason that I prefer to illustrate is a common rule in fashion industary in which the designer is successful when if the clothing changes a usual manner of his/her customer. A relevant example can shed light on this assertion. 3 years ago a friend of mine who is fashion artist asked me a meeting. Moreover, she wanted me to wear my favorite dress that she has designed it for me. Consequently, she started to speak about changes in my behaviour as a result of her work. In fact, I noticed about the things she is saying and they all were truth about changes in me.
Another reason that should be taken into account is that, a normal person adapts his/her way of behaving to the worn dress intentionally. For instance, according to a recent research study at George Washington University, the adaptation between apperiance and changes in traits of a person are systematically. Furthermore, brain of the human beings has a special part due to making changes on person's appearance after any mentality or bodily change. Thus, scientics has become sure about duality between changes in mind and behaviour or body and the way people use dresses.
To sum up, I firmly believe in the influence of clothes on the way people behave for two main reasons. first, an initial law in fashion industary indicated about intention between designers to make a change on traits of any person. What is more, people want to change their dressing model purposefully.
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 78
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace eg at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadiantage 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... uses, etc for two following reasons. first and foremost reason that I prefer to il...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...a special part due to making changes on persons appearance after any mentality or bodil...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...way people behave for two main reasons. first, an initial law in fashion industary in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83384615385 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78721680441 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9491375846 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1875 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153001149939 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475304607262 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516723658994 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978805622544 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549985000261 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.