Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People learn more by watching television than by reading books.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people spend more time watching television instead of reading books. It is often argued that if people can learn from TV more than they would learn from books. Personally, I believe that television cannot help people to learn as much as a book. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, television shows do not have enough time to go through a topic, so they often give a superficial view of a subject in comparison to books. A tv show is barely more than one or two hours, in this limited time, they only can review a topic and are not able to provide details. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Last week I watched a short tv show about an animal called armadillo. I really became interested in that animal and wanted to obtain some more information. When I searched about it, I found a book that had comprehensively explained the animal. The information in the book was ten times more than what I had seen on the show.
Additionally, television offers a lot of trivial materials instead of practical things. There are a large number of tv shows, contests, movies, etc. and a few channels provide scientific or useful programs. In fact, people are more likely to enjoy their free time when they come to watch tv and do not want to learn something, and as a result, tv show producers prefer to make entertaining materials. For example, making a documentary content often requires a lot of money, on the other hand, preparing a cooking tutorial takes far less money, however the number of people who watch these two are almost equal. This has ended in decline in instructive tv programs.
In conclusion, although television is good for spending pleasure time or getting familiar with something, but never can replace books when it comes to learning and people still should read books if they actually want to learn.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents can no longer control what their children do their behavior gets more affected by television movies and other influences from outside the home Use specific reasons and examples to support your 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People learn more by watching television than by reading books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents can no longer control what their children do their behavior gets more affected by television movies and other influences from outside the home Use specific reasons and examples to support your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... instead of practical things. There are a large number of tv shows, contests, movies, etc. and a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...ther hand, preparing a cooking tutorial takes far less money, however the number of p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, really, so, still, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71556886228 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6824091677 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0242490532 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245093883774 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738707030124 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639942597789 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166687631845 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608560415349 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.