Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past
There is a huge reservation regarding environmental issue since deteriorating the human's habitat can spark different detrimental effects such as climate change, air pollution, and diminishing ozone layer. This trend prompts a controversial question whether people have more ability to preserve nature and environment more properly that those living in the past. I adamantly subscribe to the belief that people nowadays people protect the environment better and more efficiently.
First and foremost, accessibility to the information plays an indispensable role in leading people to implement most efficient and appropriate practices to protect the environment. The emergence of the internet has revolutionized many facets of life and one of them is enabling people to access various information in an easy and economical way. If a person wants to apply a process to protect the earth, he/she just needs to search on the different website such as Google to obtain valuable information. On the other hand, because of growing social media outlets, environmental activists can easily reach their targeted individuals to provide them consultant and enhance their knowledge. On the contrary, there was not enough information about
More importantly, earth population is more able to use equipment to protect the environment. As a matter of fact, technological advancements assist manufacturer and households with the best equipment to decrease the detrimental effects of any activity in the society and economy. Admittedly, this process not only increases accessibility of the people to efficient advancement but also because of increasing attention in environmentally-friendly equipment leads private sectors to enhance the supply of these products which lead the be more economical for the public. Take a solar energy as an example, a century ago people merely used fossil energies same as oil to heat their home which because of Dioxide Carbon emission undoubtedly has severe effects on the environment. However, people nowadays are able to use solar as an alternative to fossil energies. It should be stressed that scientists could not find any bad impact of solar energy on earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | wxr031 | 52 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | Greenbluemind | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-04 | OlliverYang | 70 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | Reza3068 | 90 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | mehmoh | 76 | view |
- T P O 53 3
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 54
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 16
- “Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make 50
- It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ronmental issue since deteriorating the humans habitat can spark different detrimental...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., there was not enough information about More importantly, earth population is mo...
^^^
Line 4, column 530, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the supply of these products which lead the be more economical for the public. Take a ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 955, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny bad impact of solar energy on earth.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, such as, as a matter of fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54491017964 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25528280614 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7942828633 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.461538462 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134758130099 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508889996694 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497462154403 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963508282663 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462138543199 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.