Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood (the area where they live) than now.
It is widely admitted that the relationship in one neighbourhood is gradually distant and no longer be close as in the past. Correspondingly, people are less interested in making friends with neighbourhoods and improving their community now. Although our living condition and facilities in the neighbourhood advanced tremendously, people’s interests to devote in the neighbourhood is decreasing due to the following reasons.
First of all, there is no need for people to shoulder duties for their neighbourhood. Nowadays, the neighbourhoods have the special committee to do all the duties, such as cleaning streets, doing gardening and repairing damaged facilities. The residents can pay the fees and enjoy the service without worries. However, people have to do everything for the neighbourhood by their own. People could manage their community as well so they were motive to devote time in it. Thus, people spend less time or even no time to find the interest in doing things together with others now.
Secondly, the higher mobility of today’s life makes people attach less importance to their neighbourhood. At present, there are a few people who will live in one place for a life-long time. My aunt who has lived in four cities is a classic example. She does not care about the condition and quality of her neighbourhood because she is not sure when she will leave for next places. In contrast, my grandparents took their neighbourhood as their home. They were willing to clean the environment and struggle for more benefits for their community without any complaints. In this point of view, people in the cared their neighborhood more.
Furthermore, with the rapid development of the economy, people become more independent to their neighbourhood than in the old days. In the past, some people did a lot of things for their neighbourhood because they expected others in the neighbourhood could offer favours when they had troubles. One household wanted to refurbish house might need the help from the community because the cost of hiring a company is exclusive, while people can pay for professionals to do this work because of the higher income. That is to say, as people’s willingness to donate to the neighbourhood decrease, the needs of their neighbourhood will less now.
In conclusion, people become more independent with fewer obligations and fewer affections for their neighbourhood. As a result, they are not interested in improving it like before. Even if we have a committee to manage the neighbourhood, we ought to pay more attention to our home.
- People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 58
- in the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- women can do everything that men can and they even do it better They also can do many things that men cannot But it is a fact that their work is not appreciated as much as men s although they have to sacrifice a lot for their family and career It is said 77
- 20 The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 81
- The diagram shows the process of recycling car batteries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of their neighbourhood will less now. In conclusion, people become more indepe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2033492823 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16313270825 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8174948013 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5652173913 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1739130435 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374708856065 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122041102496 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695674557541 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238438817461 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435029944968 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.