The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The bar chart compares how much in dollars of different digital games, namely mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games in the period over 2000 to 2006.
It is clear that handheld games were the most popular digital games over the 7-year period with stable rising sales. The turnover for console games, however, was the only one with a falling trend.
In 2000, handheld games were sold for about 11 billion dollars which were almost double the amount of money selling by console games. With relatively stable development, the income from handheld games rose by approximately 5 billion to 18 billion dollars in 2006. The sales from console games, on the other hand, shrank to half after 7 years compared to the amount of money in 2000.
Online games and mobile phone games were two relatively new types of digital games, showing up in 2001 and 2002 respectively. In 2003, the selling for mobile phone games reached 3 billion dollars, which overtook that of online games. However, online games became more popular than mobile phone games in 2006, with 2 billion dollars more sales to 9 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called slip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The line below shows the time school children spend on different home activities 78
- TPO 49 81
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94210526316 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20491141523 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3193770226 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316360507562 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142210073211 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788921345751 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198513106581 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702993447318 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.