Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should not have to pay for public transportation that they use.
At present, it is extensively acknowledged that in the process of social development, the city transportation system have been ameliorated greatly and it has provided a lot of convenience for citizens. Within this context, a disputable statement, which people often talked over, has emerged that public transportation they have used should be free for citizens. On the one hand, some people support this statement since they think the public construction should be free including transportation. However, other people are on the contrary side because they think everyone has their responsibility. As far as I concerned, I totally disagree with this statement that people do not pay for public transportation.
At first, if people don't need to pay for public transportation, risks of transporting would increase and would be harder to respond. When there is no restriction on tickets, it is self-evident that more people will use public transportation, which leads to more potential security risks. For example, one day there is a lot of people in the subway station, the waiting area is really crowded. Unfortunately, my phone was stolen by a thief in the crowd. It took me a lot of time to call the police and find back my phone because so many people that it declines the efficiency and ability to respond to passengers' emergency. In this way, the potential risks have increased and become more difficult to respond.
In addition, take the subway as an example. If it is free, the cost of repairing and testing would be covered by the government, which also used the tax from the citizens. It may lead the city government to increase the tax on everybody. For instance, one study from UCLA which modeled the consequence after the free policy shows that average tax will increase by 3 to 5 percentage to every citizen. That means this situation which people have access to public transportation freely is more expensive than the normal situation that people have to pay for it. Therefore, without the financial support from the public, the cost is still and even more needed to be covered by the money from the public.
All in all, regarding to the potential risks and increased tax, it seems that it is tenable that people should pay for the public transportation fee.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and TV programs made in your own country are more interesting than movies and programs made in others. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and TV programs made in your own country are more interesting than movies and programs made in others. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks at the same time than doing the same task. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should not have to pay for public transportation that they use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ic transportation. At first, if people dont need to pay for public transportation, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96850393701 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97017086666 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498687664042 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2000539374 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375664143528 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115493274119 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112733792554 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241256633219 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112172342687 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.