Human behavior has attracted much social concern. Some sociologists believe that people nowadays spend too much time doing what things they like rather than doing what things they should do. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is the development of the world. The fact is that the fast-paced improvement of societies creates chances for the appearances of many impressive social services for entertainment. Therefore, it is possible for people today to have more access to options for recreational activities. As a result, they tend to be easily attracted and put more time in following their desire for satisfaction. Consequently, it plays a crucial role in proving that the advancement of communities stimulates the increase of people's time for amusement. More importantly, it cannot be denied that the culmination of the world goes along with better living conditions and higher income of residents. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for people to have more sufficient lives as they are capable to purchase what they want or arrive at wherever they have interests in. On that ground, needless to say, it possesses a large probability for people to gradually put higher priorities on enhancing their self-satisfaction. As a consequence, they are certain to spend more time on gratifying their personal enjoyment desire. By and large, with the advancement of the world, people nowadays have more promotions to put more time in relaxing activities.
On the other hand, it is claimed that the development of the world raises the requirement of studying and working, thus forces people today to be too busy. Accordingly, they only have very little time for personal relaxation. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that there are always policies in schools or companies to prevent students and workers from being stressed or overwhelmed by adjusting the amount of task for the appropriate assignment. It follows that people always can schedule their time effectively and put everything under control. Furthermore, the progression of the world stands a golden chance for the augment of social connecting methods such as facebook, tweeter, etc, where people are bound to chat with friends, post their emotion, make new friends or even get married to someone whom they haven’t met but just talk. Correspondingly, it is apparent that the social networks are so attractive that many people nowadays almost use them as a method to live in the other world, where they are able to escape the reality, get rid of the obstacles in their lives and just follow the intrinsic desires. For this reason, people tend to gradually build up the barrier between them and their true lives. Subsequently, it is more easy for them to spend much of their time on staying deeply in technical devices for relaxing and leave out their actual duties. Beyond any doubt, the idea that the development of societies reduces the time of people spending for their self-indulgence is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that people should take my writing into careful consideration to make a suitable decision on regulating their lives.
- TPO 3 Independent Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 85
- TPO 33 Independent WritingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 78
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of the world stands a golden chance for the augment of social connecting methods such as fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12637362637 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93690042029 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5377766358 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.96 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.84 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236438048661 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643826701645 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109654072071 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182619511777 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17296121488 0.0645574589148 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.