Nurturing children has attracted much social concern. Some specialists believe that parents nowadays are more involved in their children’s education than parents were in the past. Personally, I hold a strong agreement with the belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is study efficiency. The fact is that parents have a deep understanding of their children's strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, by being engaged in children’s education, it is possible for parents to guide them in a suitable study way. As a result, children are supposed to activate their potential ability and study better. Consequently, the regulation of parents on their children's education plays a crucial role in stimulating the development of their academic performance. More importantly, having control over children studying creates chances for parents to provide them with helpful supports. It leads to the fact that they tend to be filled with appreciate feelings and have the motivation to pay back their parents. On that ground, needless to say, it possesses a large probability for children to put more and more effort into their studying. As a consequence, children’s study productivity is certain to be enhanced. By and large, it is highly likely that having involvement in children’s education is a good idea for parents.
On the other hand, some people might say that being much-involved children’s study prevents them from freedom on their own studying paths. Accordingly, it sets extreme stresses on them. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that parents have concerns not only about children studying but also their health and feelings. Hence, they can both go along with their children's academic paths and put everything under control. Furthermore, by taking participation in their children's education, parents stand a golden chance to deliver to them the message of sincere considerations. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they are supposed to get closer to their children and increase the mutual communication. For this reason, it encourages children to express with their parent more about everything such as their difficulties in studying, problems at schools, etc. Thus, they are inclined to be more released and feel free. Subsequently, it is more easy for children to be filled with happiness. Beyond any doubt, the idea that the involvement of parents on their children’s education extremely stresses them is possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all the factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration in order to have an appropriate decision on raising children.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 7 Independent task 64
- TPO 3 Independent Writing Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44522144522 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21925009292 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.918732236 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57692307692 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321690186796 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990319960952 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878248357225 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219065719155 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113058122493 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.