Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...son giving feedback. Thanks to this, we arent capable of acknowledging the effort you...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'avoided'.
Suggestion: avoided
...is or her thoughts. Accordingly, we are avoid analyzing or questioning the persons as...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... are avoid analyzing or questioning the persons assessment even it might be a precautio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... satisfactory results in your career. Conversely, while people are accepting t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contributes to career accomplishment. On the other hand, some people might exp...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...felicitous choice for time management. In summary, career accomplishment is a c...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2806.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 545.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14862385321 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05462432004 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511926605505 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 893.7 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5913189292 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7586206897 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7931034483 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34482758621 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284134907801 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774397779406 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103276491705 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16808919453 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970795083898 0.0645574589148 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.