Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group.
The way to become successful in a career has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds people who cannot accept criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. In this paper, I will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, career success is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that rejecting criticism from others is synonymous with reacting their criticism with defensiveness and anger or even worse- attack the person giving feedback. Thanks to this, we aren't capable of acknowledging the effort your colleague took to evaluate you and share his or her thoughts. Accordingly, we avoided analyzing or questioning the person's assessment even it might be a precautionary measure warding off impending failures. With this in mind, we are unable to stand a golden chance to ameliorate the quality and production capacity of our works. Eventually, this probably gives rise to the occurrence of difficulties to achieve satisfactory results in your career. Conversely, while people are accepting criticism from others, having a felicitous choice for relationship management is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for us to gain more appreciation from our colleagues. On the ground of that, it is possible for us to get more assistance from people around. During this process, we are prone to ramp up production capacity. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for us to increase our motivation and work more energetically. Given these points, accepting criticism from others greatly contributes to career accomplishment.
On the other hand, some people might express a different view that rejecting criticism from others is waste of time. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on career success. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. We have already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is a certain purposefulness about accepting criticism from others. Therefore, it is unlikely that listening for criticism prevents us from having a great choice for time management. Another point often overlooked is even if a waste of time does exist, it should be considered as the chance for us to understand our strengths and weakness. By the same token, we have an incentive to reflect on ourselves meticulously to improve our skills, work product, relationships, and to help you meet the expectations that your manager and others have of us. By virtue of this, co-workers are given the opportunity to gain more sense of reassurance by our satisfactory capability, which creates a significant impact on our chance of getting a promotion. Beyond any doubt, we tend to learn the way to tackled the tricky problem with customary aplomb with high-level people. This, indeed, empower us to done complicated works with higher efficiency and accuracy. By and large, people should put off the idea that accepting criticism from others prevents us to have a great felicitous choice for time management.
In summary, career accomplishment is a convincing reason for my approval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the way to become successful in a career.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvements in the quality of people s lives have already taken place 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should set strict rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...son giving feedback. Thanks to this, we arent capable of acknowledging the effort you...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...we avoided analyzing or questioning the persons assessment even it might be a precautio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2784.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.146025878 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08689607839 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513863216266 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 891.0 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5297559543 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6551724138 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34482758621 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284134907801 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774397779406 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103276491705 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189128956787 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103592501668 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.