Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Plastic bags are terrible for the environment. They should be banned everywhere.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shortage of debates, bags made of polyethylene, which are damaging our habitat, should be prohibited around the globe. Personally, I completely agree with the idea that the legal banning of plastic bags and containers would assist humanity to save the planet Earth. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in my following essay.
To begin with, plastic bags never degrade completely, compared to eco-friendly supplies. It is evident that the more of these bags are produced by leading companies, more are introduced to our environment, which in turn, increases the amount of plastic pollution and its effects. To exemplify this, a 2021 research shows that plastic waste buried in 1980, has not broken down during the period of more than 40 years and this clearly illustrates the trouble that expects humanity in the future if petroleum-based bags will keep on producing. In addition, the debris of the buried plastic bags were found to be scattered in to pieces and washed out to the ocean, where marine animals are endangered to ingest them. In other words, by phasing out single-use plastics, not only the effects of plastic contamination will notably decline, but also the risk of sea animals going extinct will decrease.
Secondly, plastic bag bans can help to reduce toxic fumes. It is obvious that the incineration of plastic waste in open fields is a major source of air pollution because it releases toxic gases such as dioxins into the atmosphere. For instance, according to the study, up to 12 per cent of most solid waste is made up of plastic of different kinds, and about 40 per cent of world’s garbage is burned which is enough information to envision the pollution released into the atmosphere. Moreover, the released toxins end up settling on crops and waterways, consequently entering our food and hence, our bodies. To sum up, the worldwide prohibition of non-recyclable bags will help tackle problems regarding atmosphere pollution and free humans from the threat of diseases developed by digesting poisonous foods.
In conclusion, although plastic bags are commonly used among people, the global ban should be applied to protect our environment. This is because apart from one-use plastics being hard to completely break down, they also threaten the lives of marine animals, and because they also cause the fouling of air, water and crops that we consume.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-23 | YAGUT | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | zaid | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Aliakbari94 | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Cookiedough | 71 | view |
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affected a 70
- TOEFL T P O 12 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late1960s no to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest fir 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, apart from, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07808564232 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73500837233 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589420654912 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6352515586 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4666666667 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 5.45110844103 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203245303104 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725379509045 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490049640726 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134358895903 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482333261935 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.