Games are forms of playing, being entertained, or competing in a series of episodes or sports. It has existed for thousands of years, and its purpose varies depending on the region and culture. Modernly, the typical type of game is what one observes online, sport-wise, or on a board. An invariable factor of games is enjoying them with others or alone. No one can deny that everyone has played a game with friends or family. Thus, I agree that playing games are a great way to build relationships with others. It is my firm belief for numerous reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, a critical factor in building a connection is finding common ground. One can relate and connect since through common ideology. As one noticed, since I was a young child, I have enjoyed drawing figures, and it was through my hobby that I could start conversations with my classmates. As an illustration, when I figured Maria liked sketching animals, I decided to play a game by competing to see who could draw the best. It was through a game that I could further my relationship with Maria. For this reason, games allow people to find common ground as the foundation of a relationship.
On top of that, games require collaboration. Collaboration is working together as a team, and through this process, one can learn the weaknesses and strengths of others. Drawing from my own experience, when my class went on a high school retreat, I realized that my friend Diego was talented at playing basketball with his left hand. On the other hand, Rebeka could create origami within seconds. It is evidently clear to see why games allow one to understand and acknowledge a person in more detail.
Lastly, online games allow one to form deep connections with others. Usually, a relationship strengthens through heart-to-heart talk, and heart-to-heart conversations are typical in online gaming, such as in Valorant, Minecraft, and League of Legends. Through Minecraft, I met and connected with an individual named Joshua. With the process of building, killing raids, and going on adventures, we not only talk about our plans in the game but in life too. Since we did not know each other in real life, both of us were in a comfortable position to share our personal lives, such as academic struggles and romance advice. As a result, gaming allowed us to have a closer relationship than expected.
In light of the reasons listed above, I affirm playing games with others is the best way to build a stronger connection.
- The nutria is a large rodent similar to a beaver that typically weighs about 10 kilograms These rodents usually live in semi aquatic habitats and though they originate from South America they are now common in freshwater areas throughout North America Nut 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much money on clothing to improve their appearance Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 90
- Psychology is a natural science that descrebies and explains the psychological and sensory aspects of human behavior It studies the causes conditions and immediate consequences of sensations and emotions Psychologists view the human mind as a function of 87
- Although Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece Girl with a Pearl Earring not much is known about who modeled for the painting The curiosity aroused by the mystery brought about several theories about the true identity of the model The first candi 81
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time Compare the benefits of planning free time activities with the benefits of not making plans Which do you prefer plannin 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, second, so, then, thus, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87557603687 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87477094957 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5490136666 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.64 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.36 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246481474855 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775193595888 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861128211113 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153777360507 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567573113788 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.