Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, providing different services for people has paramount importance in each society. In this regard, some people believe that providing Internet access has the same importance as other services and should be offered freely by the governments. Personally, I agree with this group. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, offering free Internet access for all people can lead to a more successful society. To explain more, being accessible to everyone, the Internet can increase the social awareness of any individuals. Since, on one hand, in today's world affording life expenses is difficult for people, and on the other hand, surfing the Internet can obviously increase everyone's knowledge about any special subject, the government can enhance the knowledge of the whole society by offering free Internet. Therefore, people can use the Internet and its information without any concern about its cost. As a result, they are more knowledgeable people, which has the most profound influence on being successful. Consequently, any individual of the society will be successful, which results in a more successful society. Let us assume a society in which all people have free access to the Internet, so they can easily surf the Internet for any problems they have faced and find a simple solution for that. Therefore, they can use the solution for similar subjects or even suggest it to other people with the same problems. Consequently, this can make them full of information, and so build a more knowledgeable and prosperous society.
Secondly, providing free Internet for people results in a healthier society. To clarify my point, using the Internet and various social media, people can deeply be connected to each other from different points of the country and share their ideas and thoughts, so being free makes it possible that everyone can do this. On the other hand, people share many fun texts, films, and so on. Thus, these pieces of information on social media increase fun and entertainment among people of the whole society, bring them happiness, and decrease the pressure, stress, and anxiety. As a result, the average psychological health will be increased, and consequently, governments will provide a healthier society.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is essential that governments offer free Internet for the whole society. This is because this plan leads to not only a more successful society but also a healthier one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- TPO58 Task1 80
- TPO 46 The opinion of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are older people 70
- TPO26 Integrated Task 80
- TPO 45 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- TPO 43 Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19704433498 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81499832753 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480295566502 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6288324973 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221397356119 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795611847457 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627418698929 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141989686832 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543248337472 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.