Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better to be dishonest. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Honesty, as we all know, is the most important moral etiquette among human beings societies. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have been always among sociologists top priorities. In this regard, many people support this opinion that sometimes it is better to be dishonest. Contrary to common belief, I personally believe that dishonesty destroys individuals` rights and also brings distrust. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that dishonesty is unfavorable is about the human rights aspect. Although there is a common belief that says, many a white lies better than a seditious truth, the danger of humiliating a person`s right requires us to be honest. Scientifically speaking, the more an individual try to be honest, the more calm she enjoys. Moreover, it is reported that many couples who do not hide the truth from each other having more long-lasting life together rather than partners who are not frank toward each other. Although many critics challenge this idea and suggest that not telling the truth is not a lie, it is evident that common belief considered dishonesty as a kind of lie.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is destroying trust. It is common knowledge that humans are born with a natural instinct to trust, and not being honest eradicate this natural sense toward other human kinds. Indeed, new roles all around the world convince people to seek their own benefits in anyways, and telling lies is no exception. To illustrate, unfortunately, these days, the public does not look at trust as a valuable treasure; rather, to looking for their own advantage, they manipulate the truth. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when I was a little younger than now, I used to trust easily, one of the friends of mine, did not tell the right thing about a subject and let me misunderstanding the situation. Although that issue was not important, it completely eliminated my confidence to her, and it takes some years that I could trust her again. Also, it costs me a lot and requires me to do not have confidence easily to others.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that not only being honest is an essential factor but also denying it provides negative results towards relationships.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment for a company is to spend money to improve the work skills of its employees. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is a sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 73
- When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more individual'?
Suggestion: a more individual
...be honest. Scientifically speaking, the more an individual try to be honest, the more calm she enj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0675 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90598950445 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5975 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8276655314 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.684210526 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10418003843 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318398366958 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043654710962 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612134414216 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321167736332 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.