Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public
Different means of media are evolved in last decades that are ranging from basic newspapers to the NEWS corporations and recently the internet. Each of these tools provides information ranging from local to global scale. Each providing NEWS for the public for their own intention. These media's recently pop up from every corner of current societies and intend to sell their own their own NEWS at whatever cost, even by publishing lies or at least inaccurate data. This incorrect NEWS or inaccurate data pose several difficulties for the public. The problem arises by publishing incorrect data may cause public stress or unnecessary cost.
Each media has a public obligation to report correct and accurate news and when this goal shattered by the benefit of a certain group or political wing it will cause decreasing public trust. In the short term, people's reaction is as the NEWS is correct and the group profit increase but in the long term it will reduce society trust and then in an emergency event no one pay attention to the news. This situation quite resembles the story of liar Shepherd who calls people for a non-existence treat to the sheep.
On the other hand, all of these media's spent money which mostly comes from peoples own money. This cost has no return and as previous paragraph states, it will cause a mental problem for society as a whole. For instance, there was a report in a newspaper that stated there is a shortage of gasoline so people rushed into the gas station to fill their car. This report caused several accidents that cost money and lives.
In conclusion, no matter what is the media, all of these NEWS publishers flourished recently can cause bad effects on people and provide a lot of problems for the public.
- do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 85
- do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'their own'.
Suggestion: their own
...of current societies and intend to sell their own their own NEWS at whatever cost, even by publishi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...e public stress or unnecessary cost. Each media has a public obligation to report...
^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ress or unnecessary cost. Each media has a public obligation to report correct a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, at least, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84053156146 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47941158662 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7399417764 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174709894753 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068850360685 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432949745501 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11432056569 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290187762892 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.