I believe young people are making more independent decisions compare to their counterpart in the past. In my opinion, education and communication technology contributed to this independence and social structure is also force young people to be autonomous.
In the recent years, educational systems provide a common ground for young people in each country to become independent. These systems taught other's experiences through different books and courses. By understanding these experiences they can predict the result of their actions so they can make more plausible decisions. For instance, they learn that people with higher education have achieved a higher salary and as a result, they can decide whether it is worth it to go to university or not. In addition, education can help them make a better decision in wider areas while parents help to make a decision is limited to a specific area which is not enough in today's world.
Another point is that in recent years communication technology has provided a tremendous help to individuals including young people. Young people can search their situation and see if other people had the same problem and use their reactions as a model in their life. For example, once I decided to apply for a foreign university my parents could not help me much with choosing a university, but using Internet I could find several groups which listed each universities' pros and cons. As a result, I could decide what university offers a better curriculum.
Finally, features of modern world force young people to be autonomous. For example, families are no longer nucleus as past families and young people might not have access to their parents. There are many people who live in another city because of their university. In addition, we have young individuals whose parents left them behind in their early age. These features or one can say problems of modern societies actually prevent young people from parents dependency.
Overall, young people became less dependent on their parents help because they know more than their last counterparts. Additionally, technology helped them indeed to access more people besides their parents.
- Burning Mirror 71
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 75
- Monitoring or observing children while they are playing with their friends is an effective way to solve children's misbehavior problem. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'forced'.
Suggestion: forced
...dependence and social structure is also force young people to be autonomous. In th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...rld. Another point is that in recent years communication technology has provided a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23428571429 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7745255156 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4342709885 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379033266067 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125711592011 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813778109176 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226147643746 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272356786903 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.