Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think
nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
In this day and age, the media is playing an increasingly crucial role in our daily means of getting information. Recently, a hot debate on whether the media today attaches less importance on the accuracy of news arises. While the majority of people holds that it is what is exactly happening now, I think the media is reporting more accuracy news than in the past for the following reasons.
First and foremost, the accuracy of news has increased since the government and news relevant organization are putting stricter regulation into effect. As is known to all, citizens attitudes towards certain big events are based on its report from time to time, which government certainly knows. In order to not mislead people, the news readers and listeners, various regulations with regards to completely authentic reports are made by governments as well as news industry. For instance, my aunt who is a reporter in our local TV station told me that all the stuff was asked to pledge that every detail they record and report be true, as they should be respectful for all the news viewers. If not, forcing by such strict rules, they may get fired to the worst. Therefore, there is no wonder we have more access to accurate news nowadays.
Another point worth mentioning is that the comprehensive awareness of the mass as well as the whole news industry have enhanced when it comes to reporting events accurately. To state it more clearly, news workers have been educated this way decades ago, understanding the severe consequence of producing inaccurate ones fortunately. Harboring the right attitude of work and ensuring every piece of news correct have became an apparent feature of them. On the contrary, it is not hard to imagine a commonplace situation in the past: some editors exaggerate some reality and reporters say their lines wrongly, considering a little detail would not cause a bad effect to the public anyway. What an idea because of their lack of awareness as new workers!
Admittedly, incorrect reports can still be heard from different media even today, and people who condoning this exist. Nevertheless, these can be solved by governments and news companies supervising them strictly as well as society and university propagating the necessity of accuracy. To put it into a nutshell, compared with the situation long before, we should indeed feel lucky every time we obtain right news,
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure everything is correct 73
- Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...suring every piece of news correct have became an apparent feature of them. On the con...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72211314974 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.211803783 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177227473205 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582800421833 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547921657163 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113480849357 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619054318029 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.