Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
Nowadays, in this hectic era in which human being are living, there are a diverse range of media such as TV, newspaper and internet, to name but a few, in which anybody can have access to monumental amount of data. Although some people think the media are less concerned about the accuracy of news today in compared with the past, I take the issue with this wide spread belief due to some reasons. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, the media are absolutely concerned about the accuracy of news since they do not want lose people’s attention. It goes without saying that the more appealing a media is, the more reputation it has. People would not pay attention to a media in which rumors are always flying. To pave the way for this reasons, I would like to give an example of this. When I was in high-school, I always bought a magazine which published the latest news about celebrities. Eventually, I had understood that most of their news were not accurate. Therefore, I did not buy the magazine any longer. Instead, I stated to buy another famous magazine in which the written news were much more accurate. In a word, in this competitive era, media do not like to lose people’s attention so avoid being inaccurate.
Second, should the media do not be concerned about the accuracy of news, they would definitely get into the trouble. It is my firm conviction that nobody would be satisfied when something wrong has been written or said in different media about them. So, should a media broadcast so inaccurate an information about a person, the person would show reaction severely. Deeming, a magazine which has written wrongly about the relationships of two celebrities. How would the celebrities react? Would not they feel a surge of anger toward the media? Would not they have enough ground for making a complaint legally? Hence, inasmuch as people who do not like to be reported wrongly would react, the company would get into the trouble.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and examples, I firmly disagree with this statement that now the media pay less attention to accuracy of their news. In contrast, it is my firm conviction that the media in this modern era avoid publishing inaccurate news since they do not like to miss people’s attention. Besides, being inaccurate bodes ill for the media in this time, so they avoid being inaccurate inasmuch as they do not like getting into the trouble. It is a forgeon conclusion that broadcasting the most accurate news yet appealing is the key to success for a good many media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
... without saying that the more appealing a media is, the more reputation it has. People ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... are always flying. To pave the way for this reasons, I would like to give an exampl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84187082405 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70789801198 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47438752784 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0930006728 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5833333333 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7083333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241208934163 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703654142662 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639942146776 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159835672047 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365471624852 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.