Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people ( giving food or clothing) than in the past?
Nowadays, through history humans not only have tried to improve their own life style, but also they have tried to help others; needless to say that the amount of willingness differs from person to person even era to era. Personally speaking, I take the view that people nowadays are more willing to help other people than in the past due to some reasons. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraph.
First, because of the media in this modern life, anybody have more chances to become aware about people who need helps. It goes without saying that nobody can be helpful unless they realize they would be helpful. In my view todays’ media such as newspaper, TV, and the internet, to name but a few, are so useful for inform people who can be helpful for others. To exemplify, last month I read in the newspaper about a child who needed help for his remedy. The child was suffering about cancer. Reading the news, I immediately donate a substantial amount of my saving to him. Was not this difficult in the past to help others when it was hard to recognize poor people or be informed about different needs? Hence, having access to different media, humans have being informed about different needs and request which provides more room for being useful in compared with the past.
Second, generally, much wealthier people are living now, which provides more room for helping poor people. It is crystal-clear that the much money, the more eager to help others. It is my firm conviction that anybody who is can afford their own expenses would be much eager to poor people. In fact, in this modern era, the number of middle class people has being increased significantly in compare with the past which has been provided situation for helping others. To pave the way for this example, I would like to give an example of this. When my grandfather was a young man, a great many people could not afford their own expenses and they were suffering from so poor a lifestyle. How people could help each other when a good many people were bitterly poor. In contrast, these days monumental amount of people have acceptable life style which has increased people’s saving. As a result, anybody is able to dip into their saving. In a word, poor as many people were in the past, they could not help others; in contrast, having an appropriate lifestyle, people are able to help the poor now.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and examples, I subscribe to the opinion that inasmuch as people can be informed much better than in the past about people who need helps and also much wealthier people are living in different countries, there has been a significant increase in helping others in compared with the past. Then, why not accept this fact that todays the poor have been being supported by the rich more than in the past?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-08 | Choiiiiiii | 60 | view |
- One can learn a lot about a person from the book and movies that he like. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- TPO48 78
- Do you agree or disagree? People can solve important problems by themselves or by their families; thus, it is almost not necessary to refer to the government. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
- People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. DO you agree or disagree? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73852295409 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42957384584 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459081836327 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.497912384 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.217391304 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7826086957 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296352394147 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100414701352 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102483401952 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215300545767 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516164934928 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.