Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of a doubt, there are many approaches that can contribute to effectively development of a nation. The point here is that, with regards to the limited budget of the government, they should conentrate on the most impactful way. Comparing between the importance of the education of the kids and increasing the budget of universities, I think the former is better thought. I have several reasons to support my notion that I will enlarge on in what follows.
The first and the most critical reason is that investment on the children is much more effective than any other approch. Since kids do not have anything entrenched in their minds, and are free and adaptive to manupulation, so they can easily be educated. Therefore that program needs much less budget, allowing the public sector to also spend their money on other issues. In addition to that, there has been several cases that devoting budget to colleoges has resulted nothing positive for society in our country. No more money should the authoities give for government-based research in universitites. Take our state university as a compelling example. Although, this center has recieved vast amount of money in recent years, there has been not any impact on our community by that. However, the faculties of the center advertised a lot that they are going to make monumental changes in our city, while trying to convince the public to acquire those big budgets.
Secondly, a city can improve its universities through well-versed and educated students who join them. To be more specefic, the university is not a place for education, conversely, a university should only focus on high-quality research projects, which provide impact on society. In this line of thought, if they employ prolific and talented students, they are able to fulfil that obligation. Without good and already prepared students, who are capable of doing practical and academic resaerch, they can neither offer any reccomendation for improvements of city nor provide solutions for the challenges. However, if the public sector could prepare kids for higher education, the universities will also benefit from those people.
Furthermore, a lot of big movements in countries or large businensses in industry have been started by young people who have never experience any higher education. This idea make us known that universities are not playing an integral role in growing people. Thus it is needed to diversify the budget on many things including the preparation of young adults before entering university.
To summarize, in my opinion the government should focus on the very young children more than universities. This is mostly because it is better for society and can result in more benefits for the city.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lation, so they can easily be educated. Therefore that program needs much less budget, al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leoges has resulted nothing positive for society in our country. No more money sh...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
... started by young people who have never experience any higher education. This idea make us...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ing an integral role in growing people. Thus it is needed to diversify the budget on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15178571429 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87459790888 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9746366187 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218323719517 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581745398924 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496345772501 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117378698388 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618508824179 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.