Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have,but,in fact,it is a good quality for a person to have. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Risk-taking and decision-making are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact that we live in a fast-paced and chaotic world, it is necessary for us to collect more information about our decisions' consequences, before making them. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether spending more time to make an important decision is a bad quality for a person or whether it is a good quality for a person to have. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter has a more chance of being true. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Due to the fact that issues of life need more awareness and a sense of responsibility to solve them, I'd rather continue with the second approach which states spending more time on decision-making is a good treat. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that, as prices had been raised it is hard for people to afford their lives, so they have to spend more time thinking about the financial and economical decisions that they make. Some of these decisions cost negative impacts and results which make life harder than in the past. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. I was in my middle-twenty when I decided to buy a car. For this aim, I had to borrow money from my coworkers and my friends, and, more importantly, I had to return their money soon. Thus it was a hard situation, I planned all the consequences of my decision and I remember that I spent two months for research and looking for an appropriate solution to my problem.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that when people spend more time on their decisions, it helps them think critically in all aspects of their lives. For example, they can compare and evaluate their solution and make profitable decisions in their work. One of my coworkers has this treat. She spends more time for search between our customers to offer them a better decision which brings bouns and more profits for our company.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that spending more time to make a decision is a good attribute for a person.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 70
- grades encourage students to learn more 66
- all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 805, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
... sense of responsibility to solve them, Id rather continue with the second approac...
^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ntly, I had to return their money soon. Thus it was a hard situation, I planned all ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77804295943 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78831887996 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503579952267 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6555387173 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300123125562 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988428574984 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103202618996 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210709900375 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820234579791 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.