Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I absolutely agree with that statement, because I think teachers should not make their social or political view known to students in the classroom. I hold this opinion because of several reasons. First, if a teacher reveals his or her personal views about social or political issues, students may abuse him or her. Second, teachers attitudes usually influence on students beliefs directly, so teachers should not state their personal views in the classroom.
According to my point of view, if a teacher, specifically a primary school teacher, reveals his opinion about social or political issues, students perhaps abuse him because of his personal opinions. In other words, students can use information and details, which their teachers make known for them, into irrelevant subjects or even relate those views to other things, which may have bad results for teachers. For instance, when I was in primary school, one of my classmates, Ali, abused the information about our teachers political beliefs that he mentioned in our class, and Ali decided to spoil those views and attitudes to school dean. After two days, our teacher looked so angry, because he was informed that someone in our class has spoiled him, and when students made known that Ali was the person, who spied the teacher, our teacher decided to give him a severe punishment.
Moreover, teachers attitudes usually impress on students beliefs and behavior directly. As far as I am concerned, because students prefer to imitate their teachers treatments and behavior, consequently, their teachers views and beliefs about personal issues such as political or social matters have great impacts on students. Therefor, teachers should not make their personal views known to students in the classroom.
Generally, although it is a good method to inform the students in current events and acquaint them with social and political issues during their educational career, but it is better for teachers to avoid making known their personal attitudes to students in the classroom.
- two 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get the secure a job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, for instance, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26153846154 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62285629571 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3715339475 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351021923917 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179523144649 0.076458572812 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135697015608 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268323392837 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727995254335 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.