In the modern era, people are well aware of the impact of education avenue on one's future and perspectives. No one can deny the direct and indirect influence of teachers attitudes on the students. Some people may hold the view that it is better that tutors do not explain their own ideas toward the political and social issues in the classroom. However, some others may take the opposite view. From my vantage point, teachers representation of their opinions regarding these concepts will have some advantages. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which will aptly elucidate my viewpoint.
First and foremost, without a shadow of a doubt, there will be provided a proper infrastructure for the students in order to get familiar with various attitudes about society as long as the teachers assess their standpoints in class. By doing so, students could compare different views together. As a result, their ability to insights the new ideals will increase fundamentally. Furthermore, it gives rise to students to become brave enough to express their thoughts and beliefs in communities.
Another reason which deserves some worde here is concerned with this issue that the teachers and professors are the people who possess high degrees and they are educated enough to express their views for the others. Therefore, their perspectives toward distinctive subjects could be useful for the student to know them. In terms of psychological, teachers and students should not merely discuss the items related only to lesson in the classrooms, but also different significant point such as political and social problems must be taken into account. In such a situation, developing several aspects of students will happen inevitably.
To put it briefly, according to the grounds mentioned above and thanks to the sophisticated teachers that are available in the schools, nowadays the different perspectives are made known to students in classrooms. Consequently, they can dramatically enhance in the diverse field of study. Thus, it is highly recommended that different issues should put into discussing in class to benefit students from its advantages.
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 25 Integrated Writing Task 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- Consider a situation where you asked by your supervisor to participate in a group project at work. Your supervisor wants you to work with someone who has opinion who has a very different from yours. Moreover they feel very strongly about these opinions. D 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35072463768 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90517503913 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1139555865 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.588235294 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233385141797 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670495935182 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458364109771 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135310128958 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368742017797 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.