Teachers are leaders and focal points of students at schools and universities, so that is important to have an beneficial feature on students. If students were asked to learn one issue from their teachers it should be knowledge of their subject, not anything else. Therefore I completely agree with the statement that teachers should not mention their political or social point of view in the classroom because of these three reasons:
First of all, students go to class to learn technical issues and subjects, not social and political view of their teachers. This is important for them to focus on their subject and the teachers are resposible for their lessons. I remember when I was at university, one of my teachers was never started any political issues in the class because he knew not to make our minds busy with some pilitical issues even if it was a typical example regarding the subject. Thus, we were always concentrating on the lesson and subject, not other unrelated issues.
Secondly, social and political view of teachers in classrooms are desruptive in class. Not only makes the class deviated from cardinal issues, but also set in unrelated argues among the students in the classroom. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About 5 years ago, when I was at school, there was presidential election. My teacher stated his idea regarding the nominees and the essential issues of the subject had deviated. That statement split our class into two seperated part then, the agrues and contentions started till end of the class. On that day we did not study and the lesson cariculum was not completed untill end of the year.
Thirdly, political and social views of teachers are nothing to do with students. Students go to learn something and improve their knowledge to make them successful in the future. For instance: I am now a teacher, I never show any subtle clue regarding my social and political views because this is not related to the students. Since I graduated from university, I have never let myself to do such unfair thing to my students.
Eventually, I personally believe that this is not necessary for teachers to known their political and social views in the classroom. Teachers are essential part of a society, so their behavior, lectures and everything have influnces on student, so this is important for them to think about their speeches consequences.
- TPO 24 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...versities, so that is important to have an beneficial feature on students. If stud...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ge of their subject, not anything else. Therefore I completely agree with the statement t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96029776675 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72956914023 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473945409429 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4469696956 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308110230772 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103883632356 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958492722328 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193838784559 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514598653097 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.