It is hard to deny that some robots have replaced the work of teachers nowadays due to the development of technology and such a fact leads impressionable peope to generate that teachers were less respected and valued by the public currently than they were in the past. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as social relationship, financial aspect and career development are concerned, I strongly hold that teachers nowadays have higher social status in the world than they had in the past.
First and foremost, being a teacher can have a wider social network than before, as governments nowadays are focus on education. To be specific, more students get the opportunities to learn because of governments' regulations; furthermore a teacher who has hundreds of students is easy to get help when he is in emergency since his students may have authorities in some fields and can provide him assistance.
Secondly, teachers nowadays earn more the past indicates that they are more valued than before. Take the case of my uncle, who is a teacher of a rural primary school. Thirty years before, my uncle only received twenty RMB per month as the local economy was terrible. However, he now can get 500 RMB per month, about 25 times than thirty years ago since the economy has been improved by implementing infrastructure in that place. As a result, he has more disposable income and is able to improve his living standard. Had it not been for the improvement in economy over 30 years, my uncle would never be able to have a more optimal living condition.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that many teachers nowadays are easy to be replaced by robots. Ironically, parents' increasing willingness to send their children to school as these youths can have more interaction with others and develop their cooperation ability against the viewpoint of teenagers can be trained by robots. Therefore, being a teacher currently can have a more considerable career development than they had in the past due to parents awarness of improving children's collaboration skills.
In a nutshell, I mantian that teachers are more repected and valued recently than they were in the past. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as a reason of man contributes fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree it s better to take the most difficult or challenging classes in the university or college even if you will not get the good grades in them 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04106280193 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86786189464 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519323671498 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5602866152 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.764705882 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3529411765 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220605726724 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855383538575 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889262694656 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129550044634 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437734357701 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.