Technology has provided many benefits in order to make our lives easier however, it took away some important specialities such as imagination and creativity. Therefore, I agree the statement and I will explain my reasons and concerns about the subject.
First of all, thanks to the technology we are able to do anything without any obstacle or difficulty. For instance, we can pay bills/fees/rents or order food and buy anything online. That resulted a society focused on consuming. Now, people -especially young generation and children- is addicted to to anything by using internet. Worse, no one can stand the idea of living without internet connection. Because, people would have to do these activities and tasks by using their energy and they would feel tired even by planning those. Unfortunately, young people and children are only know to consume. That is why, children are losing the ability of thinking, planning, imaging and finally creating.
Second, children have started to use technological devices so young ages. Meeting tablets, computers, smart phones and so on this early harm their brain cells and eyes. Worse, these devices are a quick gates to world and children could be exposed to violent, damaging videos or photos at times. These harmful images occupy places in their minds and they start to use their capability unefficiently. Moreover, these pictures affect many kids character and psychology so they lose their innocents endless creativity.
Third, addiction of TV watching has the worst affect in my opinion. Because, TV hipnotize kids -and also adults- and their time for playing or doing some other educational activity is wasted. Children watch TV for hours without realizing it and concequently they become unsocial, consuming and uncreative individuals. Many leaders of technology rise their children in a technology free environment is a well known fact and I cannot blame them for it. Because, we and They know that creativity and imagine things starts early ages of our lives and absorbing these properties is very easy. In order to provide a better creativity, children better not to expose technological devices for a long time.
In a nutshell, technology is a very useful but dangerous thing and only we can manage to keep it in balance. That is why, children shoul not spent much time on internet or with technological devices. They should go outside and play with their friends and real toys to keep their creativity.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
- Neighbours are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbour? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 70
- How do movies and television influence people's behavior.? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 52
- Describe an object that is very special in your life Explain why this object is important to you Include details and examples in your explanation 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ng generation and children- is addicted to to anything by using internet. Worse, no o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82141808316 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5775 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9545542996 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172750288034 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487156255747 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349097982482 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988608850271 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016864535441 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.