Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Early childhood is a really crucial stage of our life for most of our development, both physically and mentally, takes place in this stage. I believe that television advertisements that are aimed toward young children should not be permitted and I will explain why I think this way in the next paragraphs.

First and foremost, imagination of young children tends to be very strong and it's not too hard to imagine companies taking advantage of this. In fact, they already do, by advertising things in ways that exploit children's imaginations. For example, when I was watching TV last week, I saw an advertisement where a child builds a spaceship using Lego bricks. Suddenly, the spaceship made out of Lego bricks turns into a real one and the child uses it to go to space and meet aliens. These advertisements might seem funny to us since we know that none of these will happen if we buy the product shown in them but most children think otherwise.

Secondly, junk food advertisements are putting young children's health at risk. It is a known fact that obesity has become more common among children. There is a very high possibility that these advertisements might be the cause of this problem since they advertise unhealthy food and beverages to kids. The minds of children are very vulnerable and we should not let advertisements use them to sell their products. Additionally, we should also consider the fact that these advertisements are (ran out of time)

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
... the fact that these advertisements are ran out of time
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 249.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89156626506 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9143679292 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622489959839 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 618.680645161 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6787793108 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189981254343 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744877550211 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050301773222 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131577912789 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176495102636 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.