Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The power of television has been studying for decades after its introduction. There is a controversy the intensity of its influence, it is considered as a true that television is actually influential to people. Especially, it affects how people think and what people think by reflecting specific views from the television. Therefore, I agree with the statement that television does not give people an accurate view of human nature.
To begin with, there is a theory that called the “Cultivation theory” explains people’s distorted belief of real world. The theory argues that people who watch television news more frequently than others have more chances to see the world as the news depicted. Since the news cover the usual topics like crimes, heavy users of television easily have a view that the world is full of crimes and human are scary and born to be evil which is an inaccurate point of view. If you see the actual rate of crimes, crimes occur really little and the cover story of news is just a small portion of it. Thus, their view of human nature is absurd.
Furthermore, television develops stereotypes of human nature. It is actually matter because it conveys biased impression of ethnicity. Think about the tv show anything you like. Asian family background character is always a nerd good at math or a hard worker eagerly chasing an achievement. How about the character whose ethnicity is Latino? He or she describes as a bright and extrovert person, sometimes a noisy and nosy person. I bet we all agree that human are different because we are just different individuals. Culture can affects, but not everyone in the same country has the same ability and personality. These portrayal in television has nothing to do with the real human nature. However, television gradually put stereotypes into our mind by giving a false notion of human nature.
To sum up, you cannot find an accurate view of human nature in television due to the fact that it distorts the reality and it represents biased perception of human nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-25 | quench | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- red rain in Kerala 71
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 76
- People should seek out information from a variety of news sources to be well informed 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'mattered'.
Suggestion: mattered
...eotypes of human nature. It is actually matter because it conveys biased impression of...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...just different individuals. Culture can affects, but not everyone in the same country h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this portrayal' or 'These portrayals'?
Suggestion: This portrayal; These portrayals
...y has the same ability and personality. These portrayal in television has nothing to do with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94202898551 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74576452966 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8079649088 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.25 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316319057781 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889415145326 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108438890678 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200946108026 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669720718558 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.