In this era of technologically advanced twenty-first century, television has always played a vital role in our day-to-day lives. With it's technology, it has made world a small place to be accessed anytime from anywhere with just one click. Discussions and debates have always intrigued public regarding proving this technology as a boon or a box full of adverse effects being played on human society. According to my perceived perception, I do not grant that it has destroyed communication among friends and family. There are plentitudes of reasons in support of this assertion.
Firstly, less availability of leisure time. People in this high-tech world are so busy to utilise their time in watching useless things on television but only awareness programs or knowledge imparting programs like discovery channel, national geography, BBC and other similar programs. They spend almost nine to ten hours working in the office and the remaining time they like to spend it with their kids and other family members. They often plan for family trips on weekend, a lot of transportation booking websites is examplary to the same. Similarly, kids too spent most of their time in schools and rest of it is spent in learning some new activities that are of great interest to them. On the contrary, if they spend some time on television they like watching animated movies or play video games or some mind games like puzzles, which help in the advancement of their memory as well as logic. Thus, television plays a role of a teacher in their life.
Secondly, the people today are smart enough to realise the importance of their responsibilities towards their family and kids. They know how to manage their personal life and professional life well in order to pursue a healthy and a happy family, they do not have enought time to watch television for anything less than entertaining and scientific programs, which they often watch with family and friends on weekend. Programs like silvester and tweety are the ones kids often like to watch with their grandparents and tom and jerry often with friends in order to spend quality time together. Programs like presidency election results, people often like to watch with their family and friends. Thus, television plays an important role in making these relationships bond much strong.
In a nutshell, to sum up the entire opinion, I will conform that television is a good technology created to enhance ability of the young generation, to create general awareness among people and make relationship bond strong. And because of the fact that the new generation is smart enought to utilise their time wisely they know all the pros and cons of the television box. Thereby making it a connectiong device to the outer world and family.
- Write a letter complaining about the dirty roads and garbage in your street.What the problems would beWhat are the main causesYour suggestions 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 76
- Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 78
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... and make relationship bond strong. And because of the fact that the new generation is smart enought to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, well, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02826086957 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74930735391 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519565217391 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1699889188 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.65 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132419317013 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046881970814 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579705731911 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918308213993 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463901927679 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.