Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.”
Our life has a great revolution since the advent of Cars. Although cars have many advantages, they have some disadvantages which should be considered. They can increase air pollution and cause some serious traffic problems in big cities. Governments should plan solutions to prevent using cars. I believe using cars will be decreased in the near future. I will explore more about the reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, air pollution and living costs are a hot problem in new societies. Without a doubt, cars have a significant effect on air pollution which raises several concerns about some problems like global warming and reducing using of cars can be a solution to prevent more contamination. The states should encourage people to avoid using their cars and provide their citizens with more facilities for transporting. By giving more information about the importance of such problems caused by using cars people will get more awareness about their role in their society. Furthermore, living costs are much more than any time before, and people’s priority is changed. They prefer to spend their money wisely or save it for their children’s future instead of buying a car. I can imagine a future in which people are aware of the care of their environments and put their money aside for other important things because transportation systems are more convenient than cars.
Secondly, in big cities, traffic issues become a crucial topic and governments should find a brilliant way to avoid it. A vast number of cars in the metropolises has an impact on everybody’s life. People in big cities usually struggle with traffics and parking areas which can waste their time and money. For instance, in the capital city of Iran, huge traffic forces people to leave their home two or even three hours sooner to go their work because at morning and other rush hours people face with an ocean of cars on the roads and streets. People who used to drive their own car in such crowded cities where there are traffic jams all the time prefer to use public transportation because it helps them to save their time. By using public transportation, they do not worry about finding a parking area which might take much time sometimes. In addition, governments should try to keep public costs of transportation as low as possible and increase cars and roads tax they also should motivate people to use taxis and buses instead. As a result, people find their benefits to use of public transportation sooner or later.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that using cars will be decreased in the next twenty years. I feel this way because people get more awareness and try to be environmentally friendly by using their cars less and because other problems like traffic issues can convince people to use public transportation more.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent’s job. 73
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believethat going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Usespecific reasons and details to explain your answer. 90
- TPO 1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.” 45
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98105263158 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75160874626 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486315789474 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8148283444 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.869565217 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181964786099 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674968650112 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512345420247 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131351503272 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020320283553 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.