Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country?
Nowadays, in this hectic era which humankinds are living, there are a significant increase in the demand for learning about different countries owing to different reasons such as migration, traveling, and education, to name but a few. Although a substantial amount of people strongly believe that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country, I firmly disagree with this widespread point of view. I take the view that movies and history books can talk about a country loudly.
First, movies can give monumental amount of information about a country’s culture. I take the view that movies not museums talk loudly about a countries culture. To illustrate, I had not have any information about South Korea until I saw a movie which was made in this country. Having seen the movie, I realized South Korea is a country whose people nurture love and try to enrich their relationship with their family members. In addition, by watching the movie, I understood what they eat. Besides, some social etiquette were mentioned during the movies which enrich my information about the country. In a word, the more movies we watch, the higher information we would have about a country.
Second, another way for learning about a country is reading the history of the country. In my reckoning, we cannot judge or honor truly without having information about the history of the country inasmuch as everything rooted is something deeper. To pave the way for this reason, I would like to give an example of this. German which is well-developed country was in extremely catastrophic condition after world war, but because of good strategies and too hard-work people the country is famous for lots of development. If I do not have any information about the history of German, I would have not been able to grasp the importance of their progresses in wide range of field. Hence, never do we able to fully learn about a country without knowing what has happened for the country through history.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and examples, I firmly disagree with this idea that museums in the best way for learning about a country. As far as I am concerned movies and historical book are the key to learn about them. Watching movies teach viewers the culture of a country and reading history books help us to enrich our knowledge about a country. Then, why not accept this fact there are other ways which are much more effective than museums for enforcing our knowledge about a country. Therefore, I highly recommend watching movies and books whenever you are eager to learn about a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | usef | 71 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | m_aalaei | 66 | view |
- TPO 40 78
- Do you agree or disagree? It is easier for parents to raise children now than it was 50 years ago. 83
- your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors which of the following two majors do you think is a better choice and why 1 a major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner 2 a major that requires m 66
- do you agree or disagree The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 84
- TPO46 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...tries culture. To illustrate, I had not have any information about South Korea until...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93891402715 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71296403024 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475113122172 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4043469916 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.952380952 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309305145252 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105405060563 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07983295355 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21122220164 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632283935835 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.