Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The way a person dresses reflects his/her characters.
For thousands of years clothes have acted as a cover for human body for resisting cold and providing protection. With evolving textile technology and diversified social occasions, clothing industry has thrived to offer modern people a variety of choices. Nowadays, wearing clothes is far beyond satisfying the need of having a cover for our bodies. Rather, it has become reflective of one’s taste and characters to some extent.
Among many of my peers in T-shirt and flip-flops, Trevor, really sticks out for his suits and tie. Interestingly, his attire perfectly matches his personality – serious, sharp, and maticulous. Even in the 8 am calculus class where everyone yawns from last night’s study or hangover, he seems to be intrigued by the eqations on the blackboard that confuse most of his peers. At times, he will interact with the professor by answering a question, or occasionally pointing out a typo the professor accidentally overlooked. Aiming to become a businessman, Trevor works asidiously to attain what it takes: outstanding academic records, and networking skills. Right after class, you might see him head for a recruiting event or a professional workshop. Since I am a mechanical engineering major, there isn’t much I know about his performance at these events. However, I would imagine a smart, articulate young man proposing sharp questions and presenting novel ideas, and capable of holding a conversation on business issues.
Based on my observation, Trevor’s professional garment matches up really well with his characters and I could almost see a shrewd businessman out of him. Therefore, the way one dresses could really capture other’s attention and serve as an indicator of one’s characters, and my perception of him just unfolds from there and shadows my judgment on a different part of his life of which I have no knowledge.
Nevertheless, clothes are not always a reliable reflection of someone’s characters. For instance, you will often find me in sneakers, sports shorts, and a tank shirt. In fact, I am the least athletically inclined among my friends. I have hated basketball since a ball wounded my fingers in the 5th grade, and any other sports also don’t get me at all. One of the worst decision I’ve made in the past year was paying for a gym membership card that I’ve never used since. Anyway, I’m not even remotely close to sporty. Although clothes plays an important role in constructing our social image, to really know a person, a conversation, some shared time are definitely necessary.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 83
- In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interes 90
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response in wh 83
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 73
- Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past andsucceed in the present? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on thisissue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, s 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, however, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25721153846 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08886560815 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649038461538 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2659177732 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8095238095 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122886274405 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347785257719 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377028299304 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717204551089 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294795676612 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.