Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people believe that work on a project with a social connection is enough, But personally, I think working in pairs is more satisfying. I think this way for three reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, This way can engender some misunderstandings. When the classmates are working via the internet, there are sometimes that, none of them understand each others' viewpoints and it will be an obstacle. For intence, Imagine one of them sends an email and explains the part that she/ he did and the other one doesn't understand the explanation, in a consequence, the other one will do the work in a wrong way, and both the projects will fail. Thus work face to face and together is more beneficial.
Secondly, When the students working together, They can get motivated by each other. To illustrate more, when young people are doing work when they are together, They will pay attention to others, and this can stimulate them to work with higher quality. For example, personally, when seeing my friends and classmates work, their process in the project tempts me to do better and faster. Therefore, I think working in pairs has myriad benefits for all.
Finally, Working in a class or asking about the project in person can improve the student's communication skills and teamwork, as well, and both communication and teamwork skills can affect students' attitudes. This can help them to try harder and learn more, and with more knowledge, they will act satisfying.
In conclusion, Working in pairs and a class can help the students to improve their skills in different areas and it can stimulate them to be better. Indeed, It can help both, teamwork skills and their communication skills, as well.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-15 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 78 view
2023-02-26 hamidbrz 83 view
2023-02-18 zaid 83 view
2023-01-26 lolo_7 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sheri1997 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...part that she/ he did and the other one doesnt understand the explanation, in a conseq...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...equence, the other one will do the work in a wrong way, and both the projects will fail. Thus ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...g way, and both the projects will fail. Thus work face to face and together is more ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...t the project in person can improve the students communication skills and teamwork, as w...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89419795222 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74751446702 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5739060769 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249743628397 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931838164492 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532341413997 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147049272718 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670205125383 0.0645574589148 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.