No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of the connection with colleagues via internet. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select contacting with my partners in project face to face. It is my firm belief that visual contacts have many pros for a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, connecting with your partners in projects or assignments can be easier by visual communication because this will decline awkwardness and complicated problems because of missunderstanding. I have to admit that my opinion this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. Five years ago, when I was at the fifth year of the university, I was prepering for my graduate project which needs using many softwares. On top of that, my partners in the project were located in a distance place from my home, so in the beginning we started our connection using e-mail by sending our notes or accomplished works. Unfortunately, this strategy did not work because using e-mail enormous concepts were not understood and caused delay in our target dates to finish some tasks. Consequently, we decided to make a meeting every week to present our theories and ideas, so after our first meeting we notice a noticable sophisticated progress in the work, because visual and speaking communication made everything easier. As a result, we completed our project in the precise date with a high degree.
Secondly, with the development of education various majors need advanced projects using programs to achieve. Drawing from my own experience. Six years ago, I registered in water supply course, the professor gave us an assignment using software called CAD, which needs at least three students in each group to finish the work. However, our effort in this project will not be completed without our personal contact, because it needs concetration and contribution from each student. Hence, this work done by making a schedule to arrange our work, where each one work on his labtop and put his notes, then we speak with each others to draw a conclusion.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that communication by personal is easier for the students to accomplish their works. This is because visual connection make ideas demonstrated and speaking makes the discussion clear.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 78
- The Little Ice Age was a period of unusually cold temperatures in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900 C E There were unusually harsh winters and glaciers grew larger in many areas Scientists have long wondered what caus 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, at least, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92035166014 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560723514212 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.637509536 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.941176471 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191921463447 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655625050148 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376932837541 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113046205509 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365667263222 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.