Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in the current progressive and sophisticated world where we live, the vital role of communication in success is crystal clear. In this regard, while some people assert it is better for teammates to send their messages by e-mail, others believe otherwise and claim that contacting in person is more effective for group members. In my view, I strongly support the second group for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, talking in person gives individuals a chance to exchange their ideas about a specific subject in a friendly atmosphere and specify each member’s tasks correctly. To be more specific, team members can talk about their weaknesses and strengths, and each person takes the responsibilities related to their expertise. It will enhance the performance of the group because the members do whatever they are perfect in. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, our university prepared a competition for civil engineering students among all universities of the country. Each team consisted of five students and should have built a steel bridge prototype and validated the numerical and practical analyses. After several meetings and discussions about members’ abilities, the group leader assigned each person’s roles. Due to my experience in designing steel structures for several companies, I became the project’s designer. Eventually, after a week of hardworking, our results were the most precise result of all participants. Had we not talked together about our abilities in person, we could not have won the competition and achieved our goal.
Furthermore, another equally remarkable point is that communication in person helps individuals convey their meaning without misunderstanding, leading to enhancing their relationship, which is critical in a team. Having a strong relationship between colleagues would cause a feeling that they are like a family with common goals and do their best to achieve the determined objectives. For instance, my brother works in a textile mill where the manager and employees have a solid relationship. During the current pandemic, the factory faced financial issues and could not pay the workers for a couple of months. My brother mentioned that all the workers looked at the problem as their own issue and tried to solve it as quickly as possible. Fortunately, the problem was solved very soon due to the employees’ hard work and their sacrifices. If the workers and manager had not had a good relationship, solving the problem would have been impossible in this challenging circumstance.
By taking into account all the above reasons, I believe that classmates or colleagues should communicate in person. This is because they can determine the duties according to each person’s ability, and talking together will improve their friendship.
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why TPO56 G 81
- TPO43 Integrated 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Nowadays a lot of students use technology like computers and smartphones for doing school work Some teachers believe that we should not limit students because it is an effective way of learning Others claim that we should limit students use of these devic 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, second, so, while, for instance, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38377192982 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03927352446 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56798245614 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0394405876 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.590909091 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186635105422 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519152089567 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364035574468 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114680345903 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246356502462 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.