It is clearly understood that in such a sophisticated world, communication is a very important issue in every situation. When people try to communicate with each other they become more effective iv their life, also communication in person and face to face have many benefits for people. Some people have inclined toward the opinion that communication should be in person, especially in classroom and when classmates or colleagues work together in some project, whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective, and believe today's and with development of technology and the internet, students can connect to each other by e-mail. As far as I am concerned, is much better to students connect to each other in person and communicate with their classmates. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first significant point to be mentioned is that when students connect to each other in person and get information about their project by communication, they are more comfortable about that project and can work on it effectively. In addition, students help each other to solve problems together and everyone get involve in project, and at the end of the semester the result would be promising. Take my personal experience as a compelling example; when I was in university, I had to work on a project with another student, but at the beginning of that semester corona virus became a pandemic and spread all over the world, so we had to stay at home, and do our project. Hence, we had to connect with each other by e-mail, and sending information for each other, after a while my classmate left the project, and did not answer to me anymore, so I talked to my professor and explain the situation but he told me that I had to finish the project alone, and that was very disappointing for me, and at the end of the semester I had a bad grad on the project.
Another reason, which should taken into consideration, is that when students connect with e-mail and share information by that, there is a possibility to some information get missed or their classmate understand the information in a wrong way, so whole the project go to the wrong direction, but if student connect to each other in person, they can understand every details of the project, and done it with perfect results. For instance, when I was in high school, I had to work with my classmate on some project, she sent information by e-mail and, I did not understand the meaning of that information, next day when I saw her, I asked about previous information and I realize that I misunderstood, so I believe when students do their project in person and communicate with each other the probability of error is reduced.
In conclusion, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that it is necessary for students to connect with each other in person, and do their project in correct way, and at the end get excellent grade in that project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he end of the semester the result would be promising. Take my personal experience as a compe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have taken' or 'take'?
Suggestion: have taken; take
... project. Another reason, which should taken into consideration, is that when studen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ir classmate understand the information in a wrong way, so whole the project go to the wrong d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81871345029 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92861620212 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428849902534 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.86738351254 643% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.1344086022 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.493176653 48.9658058833 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.0 100.406767564 205% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.75 20.6045352989 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304480742035 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130240137313 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647595957802 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20700353687 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293342711639 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 11.7677419355 192% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.1575268817 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.0537634409 187% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.