It is clear the advent of the Internet has significantly affected our lifestyle in every aspect, from work to entertainment. Although many technophiles now prefer to discuss work over digital means of communication such as email, there are a number of reasons why meeting face-to-face results in better quality of work.
First, meeting in person produces a faster speed of project completion and a sense of work satisfaction through a high level of productivity and efficiency. When students or colleagues get together for a certain period of time, they will be able to quickly talk through their work plan at once, then start to concentrate on the project right away, instead of going through a long thread of mails for the plan to be settled, which inevitably consumes a lot of time. Moreover, when gathering at the same location, project doers are surrounded by other teammates who they may need to ask for opinions and assistance. For example, if a team member reports a problem or puts forward a new idea, he/she can be responded immediately by the others without having to patiently wait for an email reply. As a result, the quality of their project will keep improving through these instant discussions.
Another advantage of discussing work in real life lies in the direct communication of ideas. Without being separated by digital screens and restrained to visual means of expression such as texts and images, project members who are seeing each other in person can easily use different types of verbal and non-verbal expression in order to interact and make their point clear. In fact, a small movement of facial expression or a change in intonation can always provide hints to truly understand what the speakers are trying to convey. This will completely eliminate the possibility of assuming and misunderstanding the message, which may cause great disruption to the project progress or even hurt the relationships between students or colleagues working in it. As compared to plain written emails, face-to-face discussion seems to be a superior method of project communication.
In conclusion, given that emailing has several drawbacks regard to its inefficiency and lack of effective communication, meeting in person is always a better choice for project teams to achieve works of higher quality. Nevertheless, it is safe to say that knowing how to make proper use of each type of communication is key to having the best of both worlds.
- TPO 59 integrated 81
- TOEFL T P O 09 Integrated Writing Task 68
- TPO 66 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO44 Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related 73
- tpo 15 the spread of the cane toads in Australia 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r colleagues get together for a certain period of time, they will be able to quickly talk thro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1144278607 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9888367669 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594527363184 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.893820468 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.857142857 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253723856974 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783034234467 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437682968997 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138847588218 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458815514446 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.