Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
For years, designing curriculums has been under a heated debate within educational professions. While some officials of the opinion that history must be an optional course, other managers consider it as a mandatory course. I, personally, believe that history must be an integral part of each program of study. Following paragraphs will elaborate on my view point.
To begin with, based on a traditional and known proverb “history repeats”. It means that all the happy or unhappy events took placed someday, might be occurred again. Given this fact, it is necessary to know about to which difficulties may we encounter and how to overcome them. Therefore, one of the ways provide this purpose is taking history course in schools. Despite of the program, mastering in historical information can assist students to gain some insight. Obviously, the more historical periods they study, the more perception they earn.
Moreover, history itself have some attraction for students in general. Not surprising, recent investigation on teaching contents assert that child are willing to hear stories. Evidences from an experiment done in Aalborg University shows that regardless of age and nationality, students not only desire for historical courses, but also shows tendency the other courses have been similar to history in way of lecturing. In this regard, teachers in cooperation with a group of software engineers and physiologist has developed a game which specifically concentrated on history education. Through the game, pupils after opting an age like as Egypt or Persian Kingdome, go through a simulated environment and themselves role a play as a soldier or a civilian. This game, profoundly, prepared a helpful feedback on youngster’s interest in historical plots.
To sum up, I agree with this statement that history had to be a part of student’s program because beside of helping to learning from history, it would be an engaging topic of study.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 40
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity. in 2010(Cambridge Academic 12). 84
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity. in 2010(Cambridge Academic 12). 56
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 76
- TPO 50 integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t would be an engaging topic of study.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in general, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37419354839 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07001882873 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648387096774 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3583847803 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130644810675 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379677877709 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376960956205 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083812060079 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233535484119 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.