TPO 50 integrated
The subject is mainly about which challanges in sending human beings to mars will arise. In this regard, passage and lecture reflects two different viewpoints. To start with, based on text, it is extremely difficult to overcome the issues like as food and water supply. In this case, the professor asserts that the solution is to plant in water instead of soil. Fortunately, these water could be recycled and re-used for another application such as air vapor. Second, while human travels could bring about some physical problems for asronauts, it could be solved by regular exercising. As lecture point out, daily activites could compensate for the travelling aftereffects by providing extra nutritions like as calcium minerals for bones. Finally, radiations would not be harmful all the times. Unlike the passage, lecture defend that solar radations would be controled by setting smart shelters outside the vehicle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | zhrnrz1992 | 3 | view |
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 81
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TPO 43- 40
- mission to Mars TPO INTEGRATED 50 3
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity. in 2010(Cambridge Academic 12). 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, while, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 1373.03311258 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 145.0 270.72406181 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35172413793 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 4.04702891845 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59411205623 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.710344827586 0.540411800872 131% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 419.366225166 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8944217619 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.