Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A relationship is a bond between two or more people. This relationship to stay in the bond is possible if all the people in the group are transparent with each other in talking matters. For any relationship to stay last is possible by only manifestation of candid attitude in ones talk and behavior. If anyone ask me about telling truth in the relationship, I would say "Yes, it is definitely important". I believe that a true relation or a true bond survives only with candid attitude. For example, if there are the friends, who are very close to each other, then it can be considered that they have been mendacious in their speaking with each other, which is clearly shown in their relationship.
Relationship, becomes beautiful when the people in it are open in all matters, may it be in talking or sharing thoughts. The bond strengths as the candidness between people in relationship increases. If the people in relationship do not candid in their talking, then the relation may last short and there are chances of a third person make use of this as silver bullet to devoid the relationship. Nonetheless the third person, if there not exist the truth among the people in relationship, their bond automatically astringents as there will be no trust if there is no truth in their attitudes.
Trust is the one more important thing that is disguised by truth. Where there is truth, there is trust and vice versa. In a relationship, how much importance a truth holds the same amount of importance a trust also worth this trust is defrayed if truth persists. With the trust, comes the reliability. If people are true in speaking, they can be trusted and are reliable.Therefore, the truth, trust and reliability go hand in hand and should be given utmost consideration for a relationship to last forever.
Thus, truth in a relationship should be given paramount of importance to last long.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Charles William | 70 | view |
2020-01-14 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
2020-01-12 | mucahit11 | 60 | view |
2020-01-07 | S M Naimul Mamun | 70 | view |
2020-01-06 | mirelly.meireles | 60 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 23
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 50
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asks'.
Suggestion: asks
...de in ones talk and behavior. If anyone ask me about telling truth in the relations...
^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...lver bullet to devoid the relationship. Nonetheless the third person, if there not exist th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...g, they can be trusted and are reliable.Therefore, the truth, trust and reliability go ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, third, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86461538462 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10153846154 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5551445494 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183131266987 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743146445221 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339150499224 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118110135677 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164879035482 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.