Is always telling the truth is the best way to foster a healthy relationship? In some relationships, white lies might raise positive feelings, yet it will eventually cases damage relationships. There is a controversy among different people about whether always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. I agree with the statement mainly for its important to form a relationship and for long term relationship.
To begin with, always be true to your partner is the most important quality of trust. In some relationships, love and respect might be equally important as trust, but trust is the first feeling necessary for any people to connect to each other and form a relationship. It is impossible to imagine that without trust people could love or respect others. As a result, always telling the truth is the most important to build healthy relationship. To illustrate with an example, I met John at my company seminar, and found out a chain of lies in our first conversation. Despite how generous and friendly he is, I could not trust him, and we never managed to be friend.
Furthermore, sometimes truth can hurt other’s feelings and may cause damage in relationship. Therefore, people prefer white lies and deceive to maintain their relationship. However, the reality is difficult and not a sweet dream. Although white lies can augment satisfaction in relationship for a moment, after your partner discover the truth, this will cause unrepaired damage in relationship. Because no lies can be hide forever. For instance, my friend Darren told me that my paper is strong enough to pass the exam because I look tired. As a result, I have to take the course all over again in the summer, and our relationship cannot restored since. Therefore, always telling the truth is the most important for relationship to last.
In conclusion, trust is the first quality people look for in relationship, and lies can be tempted because many times telling the truth to your partner is not easy. For those reasons, it is clear that in order to form and maintain long term relationship, always telling the truth is the most important consideration
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 78
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'case'
Suggestion: case
...sitive feelings, yet it will eventually cases damage relationships. There is a contro...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ause unrepaired damage in relationship. Because no lies can be hide forever. For instan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02493074792 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00921816901 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479224376731 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6364231333 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265490089318 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100595084983 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100785134399 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197279871215 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581679124588 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.