Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Children should only study or play and don’t have to do household chores.
Without a shadow of doubt, children start learning from the very first stages in their lives. They even play from the same moments on and in those plays they start to learn how to live a life. The controversial question which arises here is whether children should only study and play or they should do household chores too. I strongly believe that doing household chores not only help them grow but also it should be taken as responsibility. Following paragraphs will elucidate my viewpoint.
First and foremost, doing household chores help them to grow reliable. One important thing that parents should consider is that, they can leave some responsibilities to their children, but they should do it over time. We know in fact, leaving small responsibilities to young children will help them to grow sociable. To fortify my argument with statistics, let me explain a recent study. In this study 300 families were told to leave small responsibilities in household chores to their youngsters. These children then showed significant improvements in their group activities in school over time. This study clearly shows how leaving responsibilities to children can be fruitful to them.
Second noteworthy point to mention is, by doing household chores they will feel important. The more children feel being important, the more they feel self-esteem. In this case, by becoming young adults they won’t suffer from lack of self-confidence which relatively corresponds with their creativity. To give a personal example, I enjoy painting. This is my way of controlling dismal feelings. Before starting a new painting, I usually do some chores around the house. Based on my experience, by putting time on those chores, I can feel free and I can paint with no strings attached. That I think makes my paintings so brand new. By this means, children can make use of those chores to boost their creativity in the long run.
To sum up, doing household chores for children not only would be beneficial to them in their childhood, but also would make tremendous impact in their social adulthood life. I strongly believe children should play and study but they should do household chores too. I firmly recommend parents should leave some small responsibilities in doing household work to their children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | mohamadjhr | 66 | view |
| 2017-09-22 | maryamz90 | 91 | view |
| 2017-04-13 | Reyhaneh1990 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for the government to spendmoney on art museums and concert halls than onrecreational facilities such as swimming pools andplaygrounds. 76
- optimistic or not optimistic 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is moreimportant than achieving success. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Sports teach people lessons about life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Professional athletes, such as football and basketball players, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime on those chores, I can feel free and I can paint with no strings attached. Th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, i think, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90661284354 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509333333333 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.516422133 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2083333333 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289542747001 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892985804763 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086804041354 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208969759115 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757567548283 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.